[ad_1]
Egypt and Sudan: Colonial Guardianship in Disguise or Regional Partnership?
By: Abu Najma
Since the outbreak of the Sudanese revolution, it has become clear that the democratic transition in Sudan faces not only internal obstacles, but also external regional interference aimed at derailing it. At the forefront of these forces stands Egypt, which has consistently played a central role in igniting crises and undermining Sudan’s democratic path.
Historically, Egypt has never truly regarded Sudan as a sovereign neighbor, but rather as a geographic extension that must remain under its influence. For this reason, it has provided unwavering support to military regimes and remnants of the former Islamist regime, blocking any real progress toward political freedom or economic recovery.
Even worse, Egypt has actively lobbied American and European policymakers, using paid lobbyists and firms to prevent the lifting of sanctions on Sudan, seeking to keep the country trapped in a cycle of international isolation and fragility—making it easier to dominate and exploit.
When former Prime Minister Abdalla Hamdok managed to make progress on the international front and secure the lifting of some sanctions, this was seen in Cairo as a threat to Egyptian interests. Egypt then pivoted to a new plan: deliberately weakening the transitional government by fueling internal divisions and empowering Islamists and military elements, with the goal of returning Sudan to square one.
The next phase was even more dangerous: supporting the outbreak of war by all available means—logistically, politically, and indirectly militarily—ensuring Sudan remained in a state of internal conflict. The goal?
To plunder Sudan’s natural resources—its gold, fertile lands, livestock, and to solidify control over disputed territories like Halayeb and Shalateen.
Meanwhile, Egypt has chosen to ignore the dire economic conditions of its own population, diverting Gulf and Western aid away from development and instead investing in destabilizing African nations. Egypt has meddled in the affairs of Libya, Ethiopia, Eritrea, Chad, South Sudan, and Sudan, not to build regional alliances, but to sow discord and fuel proxy conflicts.
Today, as the international community—especially the United States—tries to facilitate a peace process in Sudan, Egypt stands as a primary obstacle, insisting on the military remaining in power. Why? Because the military serves Egyptian strategic interests.
And Egypt has shown no concern for the bloodshed, famine, or the death of innocent children resulting from the ongoing war.
This raises a difficult but necessary question:
Is Egypt truly a “sisterly nation”?
The reality says otherwise. Egypt no longer acts as a partner or ally, but rather as a regional power that seeks to dominate Sudan through arrogance and cold political calculation.
The silence about Egypt’s destructive role must end. The era of foreign guardianship is over.
The Sudanese people are increasingly aware of their rights, their sovereignty, and their future—and they are ready to defend it.
Sooner or later, the tide will turn. And those who conspired to destroy Sudan will face the consequences.
[ad_2]
Source
